Why the Same Fight Happens 100 Times and How IFS Can Stop It

Why the Same Fight Happens 100 Times and How IFS Can Stop It

Why the Same Fight Happens a Hundred Times (And What’s Actually Going On Underneath)

Here’s something I’ve noticed after working with couples for over three decades: most people walk into my office convinced they have a communication problem. They don’t. What they have is a protection problem.

Two people who care about each other, both running old defensive programs that were never designed for the relationship they’re trying to build right now.

That couple who keeps having the same argument about the dishes or the in-laws or how money gets spent? They’re not really fighting about any of those things. Their protectors are fighting. And until we understand that, the loop just keeps spinning.

I want to walk you through what I mean by that, because once you see it, you can’t unsee it. And that’s where real change starts.

The Short Version

Repetitive couple arguments aren’t about the topic on the surface. They’re driven by protective parts of each partner—parts that developed in childhood to shield us from old wounds. Internal Family Systems (IFS) therapy gives couples a framework to recognize those parts, pause the automatic reaction, and communicate from their healthy adult self instead. The result is that the bickering loop breaks—not because you learn a script, but because you’re no longer letting a frightened eight-year-old run your marriage.

What most people miss:

→ The partner who shuts down isn’t being cold. They’re running a childhood survival program.

→ The partner who gets loud isn’t being aggressive. A part of them is fighting against invisibility.

→ You don’t fix this by trying harder at communication. You fix it by learning to speak about your parts rather than speaking as your parts.

What’s Really Going On When Couples Keep Having the Same Fight

Every couple I’ve ever worked with—and I’m talking about thousands of couples at this point—comes in describing some version of the same thing. She says one thing, he does another thing, and within ninety seconds they’re right back in the ditch. Different words, same fight. Over and over.

The reason it keeps happening is that it’s not actually them fighting. It’s their protectors. In Internal Family Systems therapy—IFS, which I use in my practice alongside EMDR and other trauma treatments—we recognize that every person carries different parts.

Some of those parts are wounded. They got hurt in childhood, and they carry beliefs like I’m not good enough or I’m not safe or I don’t matter. Nobody gets through life unbruised.

And then we develop other parts—protective parts—whose whole job is to make sure we never have to feel those old wounds again. Those protective parts made a lot of sense when we were kids. The problem is they’re still running the show decades later, in a relationship they weren’t designed for.

Managers and Firefighters: The Two Types of Protectors

IFS identifies two kinds of protective parts, and I find this distinction incredibly helpful when I’m sitting with a couple who can’t figure out why they keep ending up in the same place.

The Manager

The manager is the part that works preventively. It tries to keep the old wounds from ever getting activated in the first place. A manager might look like the person who gets critical and controlling—picking at their partner, pointing out what’s wrong, keeping a mental scoreboard. Or it might look like the person who goes quiet and compliant, never rocking the boat, never asking for what they need. Both are management strategies. Both are trying to prevent pain.

The Firefighter

The firefighter shows up when the wound is already activated—when the pain is coming up fast and overwhelming. Firefighters don’t prevent; they distract. They pull you toward anything that will take the edge off: a video game, a bottle of wine, scrolling your phone for three hours, picking a new fight about something else entirely. The firefighter doesn’t care about long-term consequences. It just needs the pain to stop right now.

When you see a couple locked in a cycle—one partner escalating, the other withdrawing—what you’re almost always seeing is a manager in one person triggering a firefighter in the other. And then it feeds back on itself.

A Real Pattern I See in My Office All the Time

Let me give you an example. I’m thinking of a couple I worked with—and I’ve worked with dozens of variations of this same dynamic, so I’m combining details here to protect privacy.

She grew up feeling invisible. Her parents were preoccupied, distracted, emotionally unavailable. She learned that she had to fight to be seen. So when she feels her partner pulling away, a part of her rises up—a manager—that gets loud and critical. “You never show that you care about me. Never.” That’s not her whole self talking. That’s the part of her that refuses to be invisible again.

He grew up with a parent who was emotionally volatile—raging, unpredictable, sometimes frightening. As a child, his survival strategy was to disappear. Get small, get quiet, find something to focus on until the storm passed. So when his wife’s voice starts rising, a part of him—his firefighter—does exactly what it was trained to do: he shuts down. Goes to the computer. Closes the door. Puts on a game.

And then what happens to her? She feels even more invisible. So her protector cranks up louder. Which makes his protector retreat further. Back and forth, back and forth. The bickering loop.

Neither of them is a bad person. Neither of them is trying to hurt the other. They’re each running a program that made total sense when they were seven years old. It just doesn’t work now.

Why “Just Communicate Better” Doesn’t Work

I know this might be a little different from what you’ve heard elsewhere. A lot of relationship advice comes down to learning communication formulas—use “I statements,” mirror your partner back, take turns. And those tools have their place. I teach some of them myself.

But here’s the thing: when a protective part has hijacked you, you can’t use those tools. You can know the formula perfectly and still not be able to access it in the moment, because the part of you that’s running the show doesn’t care about formulas. It cares about survival.

That’s why I’ve found IFS to be so powerful with couples. It doesn’t just give you new words to say. It helps you understand why you can’t say them when it matters most—and what to do about that.

Speaking “From” a Part vs. Speaking “As” a Part

This is the key shift, and I’ve seen it change relationships in ways that still move me after all these years of doing this work.

Speaking as a part sounds like: “You always demonstrate how you don’t care about me.”

Speaking from a part sounds like: “There’s a part of me that feels really lonely when I’m in pain and you pull away.”

Can you feel the difference? The first one comes at your partner like an accusation. The second one lets your partner see what’s actually happening inside you. It’s vulnerable, it’s honest, and it makes it much easier for the other person to respond with care instead of defense.

When someone says “There’s a part of me that…” they’re speaking from their healthy, mature self. They’re acknowledging the part without being consumed by it. They’re honoring what that part feels while still being present in the adult relationship.

I’ll be personal for a second here. In my own life, I had a strong habit of getting defensive. And what I had to learn was that the defensive part wasn’t a failure in me. It was a part trying to protect me from feeling inadequate. Once I could recognize that—oh, there’s that part again, it believes I’m only okay if my partner is happy with me—I could start to question it. Is that actually true? Do I need her approval to be a worthwhile person? The answer, clearly, is no. But until I saw the part for what it was, it ran me.

The Pause-and-Pivot Practice

So how do you actually do this in real life, when emotions are high and your protector is screaming at you to do the same thing you’ve always done?

I teach couples to pause and pivot. It’s simple to describe, harder to practice, and incredibly rewarding when it starts to click.

Step 1: Notice the Part

You catch yourself in the reactive moment. Your jaw is tightening, your chest is constricting, you’re about to say the thing you always say. Right there, you notice: a part of me is activated right now. That noticing—that tiny gap of awareness—is everything.

Step 2: Tune In

Instead of acting on the impulse, you turn toward it with curiosity. What is this part trying to protect me from? What does it believe will happen if it doesn’t step in? You don’t have to have a long internal dialogue. Even a half-second of wondering is enough to create space.

Step 3: Speak About It

Now you communicate from your adult self, about the part: “I want to hear you, but I notice there’s a part of me that’s freaking out right now. It wants to defend itself and get mean, and I know that’s not going to help us.”

That kind of honesty does something remarkable. It disarms the cycle. When you name what’s happening inside you without acting it out, your partner’s protective part can stand down too. The bickering loop loses its fuel.

Recognizing Which Pattern Is Running Your Relationship

Here’s a framework I use with couples to help them identify what’s happening under the surface. See which pattern sounds familiar:

Pursue – Withdraw What it looks like: One partner escalates, the other shuts down or leaves the room. The wound underneath: Pursuer fears being invisible or abandoned. Withdrawer fears being overwhelmed or out of control. The pivot: “A part of me needs to know you’re still here.” / “A part of me shuts down when things feel intense.”

Criticize – Defend What it looks like: One partner lists grievances, the other explains why they’re wrong. The wound underneath: Critic fears not mattering. Defender fears being inadequate. The pivot: “There’s a part of me that feels dismissed.” / “There’s a part of me that hears I’m failing you.”

Freeze – Freeze What it looks like: Both partners go silent, avoid conflict entirely, and drift apart over time. The wound underneath: Both carry fear that any expression of need will cause rejection or chaos. The pivot: “I notice a part of me goes quiet when things get hard. I don’t want that for us.”

Escape – Over-Adapt What it looks like: One partner numbs through substances or distraction; the other over-functions and loses themselves. The wound underneath: Escaper fears facing internal pain. Over-adapter fears that setting boundaries will cause abandonment. The pivot: “A part of me is running from what I feel.” / “A part of me is afraid to ask for what I need.”

When Bigger Wounds Are Part of the Picture

I want to be honest about something. The pause-and-pivot approach works beautifully for everyday protective patterns—the defensiveness, the withdrawal, the criticism that shows up in daily life. But some couples are dealing with layers that go deeper.

When infidelity is involved, for instance, the wounds are fresh and they’re intense. The betrayed partner’s protectors are in overdrive for good reason—the threat wasn’t imagined, it was real. And the person who betrayed may have their own firefighters running the show: the drinking that was an escape from anxiety, the affair that was a distraction from pain they didn’t know how to face.

I work with a lot of couples in this situation, and what I’ve found is that IFS gives them a language for what happened that goes beyond blame. Instead of “You destroyed our marriage,” it becomes possible to say, “A part of you was running from something, and it caused tremendous damage.” That’s not letting anyone off the hook. It’s making it possible to actually deal with what happened, rather than staying stuck in the loop of accusation and defense.

If past trauma—whether childhood experiences, previous betrayals, or other deep wounds—is part of your story, the protective parts can be especially entrenched. In those cases, working with a therapist who understands IFS and trauma treatment methods like EMDR can make a significant difference. The parts didn’t develop overnight, and they usually need more than a conversation to start loosening their grip.

What Recovery Actually Looks Like

I want to be clear about something, because I think a lot of content out there gives people the wrong impression. This isn’t a weekend fix. Recognizing your parts is the beginning, not the end.

What I typically see with couples who commit to this work is that the first few weeks feel awkward. You’re catching yourself mid-reaction, and it’s clunky. You might notice the part but still act on it anyway. That’s normal. That’s progress, actually, because you couldn’t see it before at all.

Over a few months, something shifts. The pause gets a little longer. The pivot gets a little more natural. And your partner starts to feel safer—not because the problems are gone, but because you’re no longer coming at them with a seven-year-old’s survival strategy.

I’ve watched couples who could barely sit in the same room get to a place where they can hold each other’s pain. That doesn’t happen because they read a book or memorized a technique. It happens because they learned to see themselves—and each other—differently.

Frequently Asked Questions About IFS and Couples Work

What is Internal Family Systems (IFS) therapy?

IFS is a therapeutic model developed by Dr. Richard Schwartz that recognizes we all have multiple parts within us—protective parts, wounded parts, and a core Self. In couples work, it helps partners understand that their reactive patterns are driven by protective parts trying to shield them from old pain, not by character flaws.

Can IFS help with infidelity recovery?

Absolutely. I use IFS alongside EMDR and other approaches in my work with couples recovering from betrayal. IFS gives both the betrayed partner and the person who betrayed a framework for understanding what drove the behavior and what needs to heal—without bypassing the pain or rushing to forgiveness.

Do both partners need to learn IFS for it to work?

It’s most effective when both partners engage with the framework, but even one person shifting out of their protective pattern changes the entire dynamic. When one partner stops speaking “as” their reactive part, the other partner’s protector often has less to react to.

How is IFS different from regular couples counseling?

Traditional couples counseling often focuses on communication skills and conflict resolution strategies. IFS goes underneath those strategies to address why you can’t use them when it matters most. It’s not that communication tools are bad—it’s that they don’t work when a protective part has taken the wheel.

What are “managers” and “firefighters” in IFS?

Managers are protective parts that work preventively—they try to keep you from ever feeling the old wound. They might show up as people-pleasing, controlling behavior, or chronic criticism. Firefighters are reactive—they activate when the wound is already coming up and try to distract or numb you away from it through things like substance use, screen time, emotional affairs, or explosive anger.

How long does IFS couples therapy typically take?

Every situation is different, which is something I’m always honest about. Some couples feel a meaningful shift within a few sessions once they start to see the parts dynamic at play. Deeper work—especially when trauma, addiction, or infidelity is involved—often benefits from several months of consistent effort. The goal isn’t perfection; it’s developing the awareness to catch the pattern before it takes over.


Moving Forward

If you recognized your relationship in any of this, I want you to know something: that recognition is a sign of strength, not failure. The fact that you’re still trying to understand what’s going wrong means a part of you hasn’t given up. And that part matters.

The couples who do well in my practice aren’t the ones who never fight. They’re the ones who learn to catch themselves in the act—to notice when a protective part has taken over, to pause, and to choose a different response. It’s not about being perfect. It’s about being willing to look at what’s really happening.

That’s how we break the bickering loop. Not with a better argument, but with a better understanding of who’s actually doing the arguing.


About Todd Creager

Todd Creager, LCSW, LMFT, is a relationship therapist and infidelity recovery specialist with over 30 years of clinical experience working with couples. He integrates Internal Family Systems (IFS), EMDR, and other evidence-based approaches to help partners move from reactive bickering to genuine connection. Todd’s work is grounded in the belief that recovery—from betrayal, from old patterns, from the wounds we carry—is not only possible but can lead to deeper, more authentic relationships than partners ever had before.

What if your next argument could bring you closer instead of driving you apart?


Learn how in Todd Creager’s Loving & Connecting Masterclass.
Lifetime access. Real results.

Popular Post

Contact Us

Why the Same Fight Happens 100 Times and How IFS Can Stop It

Why the Same Fight Happens 100 Times and How IFS Can Stop It

Why the Same Fight Happens a Hundred Times (And What’s Actually Going On Underneath)

Here’s something I’ve noticed after working with couples for over three decades: most people walk into my office convinced they have a communication problem. They don’t. What they have is a protection problem.

Two people who care about each other, both running old defensive programs that were never designed for the relationship they’re trying to build right now.

That couple who keeps having the same argument about the dishes or the in-laws or how money gets spent? They’re not really fighting about any of those things. Their protectors are fighting. And until we understand that, the loop just keeps spinning.

I want to walk you through what I mean by that, because once you see it, you can’t unsee it. And that’s where real change starts.

The Short Version

Repetitive couple arguments aren’t about the topic on the surface. They’re driven by protective parts of each partner—parts that developed in childhood to shield us from old wounds. Internal Family Systems (IFS) therapy gives couples a framework to recognize those parts, pause the automatic reaction, and communicate from their healthy adult self instead. The result is that the bickering loop breaks—not because you learn a script, but because you’re no longer letting a frightened eight-year-old run your marriage.

What most people miss:

→ The partner who shuts down isn’t being cold. They’re running a childhood survival program.

→ The partner who gets loud isn’t being aggressive. A part of them is fighting against invisibility.

→ You don’t fix this by trying harder at communication. You fix it by learning to speak about your parts rather than speaking as your parts.

What’s Really Going On When Couples Keep Having the Same Fight

Every couple I’ve ever worked with—and I’m talking about thousands of couples at this point—comes in describing some version of the same thing. She says one thing, he does another thing, and within ninety seconds they’re right back in the ditch. Different words, same fight. Over and over.

The reason it keeps happening is that it’s not actually them fighting. It’s their protectors. In Internal Family Systems therapy—IFS, which I use in my practice alongside EMDR and other trauma treatments—we recognize that every person carries different parts.

Some of those parts are wounded. They got hurt in childhood, and they carry beliefs like I’m not good enough or I’m not safe or I don’t matter. Nobody gets through life unbruised.

And then we develop other parts—protective parts—whose whole job is to make sure we never have to feel those old wounds again. Those protective parts made a lot of sense when we were kids. The problem is they’re still running the show decades later, in a relationship they weren’t designed for.

Managers and Firefighters: The Two Types of Protectors

IFS identifies two kinds of protective parts, and I find this distinction incredibly helpful when I’m sitting with a couple who can’t figure out why they keep ending up in the same place.

The Manager

The manager is the part that works preventively. It tries to keep the old wounds from ever getting activated in the first place. A manager might look like the person who gets critical and controlling—picking at their partner, pointing out what’s wrong, keeping a mental scoreboard. Or it might look like the person who goes quiet and compliant, never rocking the boat, never asking for what they need. Both are management strategies. Both are trying to prevent pain.

The Firefighter

The firefighter shows up when the wound is already activated—when the pain is coming up fast and overwhelming. Firefighters don’t prevent; they distract. They pull you toward anything that will take the edge off: a video game, a bottle of wine, scrolling your phone for three hours, picking a new fight about something else entirely. The firefighter doesn’t care about long-term consequences. It just needs the pain to stop right now.

When you see a couple locked in a cycle—one partner escalating, the other withdrawing—what you’re almost always seeing is a manager in one person triggering a firefighter in the other. And then it feeds back on itself.

A Real Pattern I See in My Office All the Time

Let me give you an example. I’m thinking of a couple I worked with—and I’ve worked with dozens of variations of this same dynamic, so I’m combining details here to protect privacy.

She grew up feeling invisible. Her parents were preoccupied, distracted, emotionally unavailable. She learned that she had to fight to be seen. So when she feels her partner pulling away, a part of her rises up—a manager—that gets loud and critical. “You never show that you care about me. Never.” That’s not her whole self talking. That’s the part of her that refuses to be invisible again.

He grew up with a parent who was emotionally volatile—raging, unpredictable, sometimes frightening. As a child, his survival strategy was to disappear. Get small, get quiet, find something to focus on until the storm passed. So when his wife’s voice starts rising, a part of him—his firefighter—does exactly what it was trained to do: he shuts down. Goes to the computer. Closes the door. Puts on a game.

And then what happens to her? She feels even more invisible. So her protector cranks up louder. Which makes his protector retreat further. Back and forth, back and forth. The bickering loop.

Neither of them is a bad person. Neither of them is trying to hurt the other. They’re each running a program that made total sense when they were seven years old. It just doesn’t work now.

Why “Just Communicate Better” Doesn’t Work

I know this might be a little different from what you’ve heard elsewhere. A lot of relationship advice comes down to learning communication formulas—use “I statements,” mirror your partner back, take turns. And those tools have their place. I teach some of them myself.

But here’s the thing: when a protective part has hijacked you, you can’t use those tools. You can know the formula perfectly and still not be able to access it in the moment, because the part of you that’s running the show doesn’t care about formulas. It cares about survival.

That’s why I’ve found IFS to be so powerful with couples. It doesn’t just give you new words to say. It helps you understand why you can’t say them when it matters most—and what to do about that.

Speaking “From” a Part vs. Speaking “As” a Part

This is the key shift, and I’ve seen it change relationships in ways that still move me after all these years of doing this work.

Speaking as a part sounds like: “You always demonstrate how you don’t care about me.”

Speaking from a part sounds like: “There’s a part of me that feels really lonely when I’m in pain and you pull away.”

Can you feel the difference? The first one comes at your partner like an accusation. The second one lets your partner see what’s actually happening inside you. It’s vulnerable, it’s honest, and it makes it much easier for the other person to respond with care instead of defense.

When someone says “There’s a part of me that…” they’re speaking from their healthy, mature self. They’re acknowledging the part without being consumed by it. They’re honoring what that part feels while still being present in the adult relationship.

I’ll be personal for a second here. In my own life, I had a strong habit of getting defensive. And what I had to learn was that the defensive part wasn’t a failure in me. It was a part trying to protect me from feeling inadequate. Once I could recognize that—oh, there’s that part again, it believes I’m only okay if my partner is happy with me—I could start to question it. Is that actually true? Do I need her approval to be a worthwhile person? The answer, clearly, is no. But until I saw the part for what it was, it ran me.

The Pause-and-Pivot Practice

So how do you actually do this in real life, when emotions are high and your protector is screaming at you to do the same thing you’ve always done?

I teach couples to pause and pivot. It’s simple to describe, harder to practice, and incredibly rewarding when it starts to click.

Step 1: Notice the Part

You catch yourself in the reactive moment. Your jaw is tightening, your chest is constricting, you’re about to say the thing you always say. Right there, you notice: a part of me is activated right now. That noticing—that tiny gap of awareness—is everything.

Step 2: Tune In

Instead of acting on the impulse, you turn toward it with curiosity. What is this part trying to protect me from? What does it believe will happen if it doesn’t step in? You don’t have to have a long internal dialogue. Even a half-second of wondering is enough to create space.

Step 3: Speak About It

Now you communicate from your adult self, about the part: “I want to hear you, but I notice there’s a part of me that’s freaking out right now. It wants to defend itself and get mean, and I know that’s not going to help us.”

That kind of honesty does something remarkable. It disarms the cycle. When you name what’s happening inside you without acting it out, your partner’s protective part can stand down too. The bickering loop loses its fuel.

Recognizing Which Pattern Is Running Your Relationship

Here’s a framework I use with couples to help them identify what’s happening under the surface. See which pattern sounds familiar:

Pursue – Withdraw What it looks like: One partner escalates, the other shuts down or leaves the room. The wound underneath: Pursuer fears being invisible or abandoned. Withdrawer fears being overwhelmed or out of control. The pivot: “A part of me needs to know you’re still here.” / “A part of me shuts down when things feel intense.”

Criticize – Defend What it looks like: One partner lists grievances, the other explains why they’re wrong. The wound underneath: Critic fears not mattering. Defender fears being inadequate. The pivot: “There’s a part of me that feels dismissed.” / “There’s a part of me that hears I’m failing you.”

Freeze – Freeze What it looks like: Both partners go silent, avoid conflict entirely, and drift apart over time. The wound underneath: Both carry fear that any expression of need will cause rejection or chaos. The pivot: “I notice a part of me goes quiet when things get hard. I don’t want that for us.”

Escape – Over-Adapt What it looks like: One partner numbs through substances or distraction; the other over-functions and loses themselves. The wound underneath: Escaper fears facing internal pain. Over-adapter fears that setting boundaries will cause abandonment. The pivot: “A part of me is running from what I feel.” / “A part of me is afraid to ask for what I need.”

When Bigger Wounds Are Part of the Picture

I want to be honest about something. The pause-and-pivot approach works beautifully for everyday protective patterns—the defensiveness, the withdrawal, the criticism that shows up in daily life. But some couples are dealing with layers that go deeper.

When infidelity is involved, for instance, the wounds are fresh and they’re intense. The betrayed partner’s protectors are in overdrive for good reason—the threat wasn’t imagined, it was real. And the person who betrayed may have their own firefighters running the show: the drinking that was an escape from anxiety, the affair that was a distraction from pain they didn’t know how to face.

I work with a lot of couples in this situation, and what I’ve found is that IFS gives them a language for what happened that goes beyond blame. Instead of “You destroyed our marriage,” it becomes possible to say, “A part of you was running from something, and it caused tremendous damage.” That’s not letting anyone off the hook. It’s making it possible to actually deal with what happened, rather than staying stuck in the loop of accusation and defense.

If past trauma—whether childhood experiences, previous betrayals, or other deep wounds—is part of your story, the protective parts can be especially entrenched. In those cases, working with a therapist who understands IFS and trauma treatment methods like EMDR can make a significant difference. The parts didn’t develop overnight, and they usually need more than a conversation to start loosening their grip.

What Recovery Actually Looks Like

I want to be clear about something, because I think a lot of content out there gives people the wrong impression. This isn’t a weekend fix. Recognizing your parts is the beginning, not the end.

What I typically see with couples who commit to this work is that the first few weeks feel awkward. You’re catching yourself mid-reaction, and it’s clunky. You might notice the part but still act on it anyway. That’s normal. That’s progress, actually, because you couldn’t see it before at all.

Over a few months, something shifts. The pause gets a little longer. The pivot gets a little more natural. And your partner starts to feel safer—not because the problems are gone, but because you’re no longer coming at them with a seven-year-old’s survival strategy.

I’ve watched couples who could barely sit in the same room get to a place where they can hold each other’s pain. That doesn’t happen because they read a book or memorized a technique. It happens because they learned to see themselves—and each other—differently.

Frequently Asked Questions About IFS and Couples Work

What is Internal Family Systems (IFS) therapy?

IFS is a therapeutic model developed by Dr. Richard Schwartz that recognizes we all have multiple parts within us—protective parts, wounded parts, and a core Self. In couples work, it helps partners understand that their reactive patterns are driven by protective parts trying to shield them from old pain, not by character flaws.

Can IFS help with infidelity recovery?

Absolutely. I use IFS alongside EMDR and other approaches in my work with couples recovering from betrayal. IFS gives both the betrayed partner and the person who betrayed a framework for understanding what drove the behavior and what needs to heal—without bypassing the pain or rushing to forgiveness.

Do both partners need to learn IFS for it to work?

It’s most effective when both partners engage with the framework, but even one person shifting out of their protective pattern changes the entire dynamic. When one partner stops speaking “as” their reactive part, the other partner’s protector often has less to react to.

How is IFS different from regular couples counseling?

Traditional couples counseling often focuses on communication skills and conflict resolution strategies. IFS goes underneath those strategies to address why you can’t use them when it matters most. It’s not that communication tools are bad—it’s that they don’t work when a protective part has taken the wheel.

What are “managers” and “firefighters” in IFS?

Managers are protective parts that work preventively—they try to keep you from ever feeling the old wound. They might show up as people-pleasing, controlling behavior, or chronic criticism. Firefighters are reactive—they activate when the wound is already coming up and try to distract or numb you away from it through things like substance use, screen time, emotional affairs, or explosive anger.

How long does IFS couples therapy typically take?

Every situation is different, which is something I’m always honest about. Some couples feel a meaningful shift within a few sessions once they start to see the parts dynamic at play. Deeper work—especially when trauma, addiction, or infidelity is involved—often benefits from several months of consistent effort. The goal isn’t perfection; it’s developing the awareness to catch the pattern before it takes over.


Moving Forward

If you recognized your relationship in any of this, I want you to know something: that recognition is a sign of strength, not failure. The fact that you’re still trying to understand what’s going wrong means a part of you hasn’t given up. And that part matters.

The couples who do well in my practice aren’t the ones who never fight. They’re the ones who learn to catch themselves in the act—to notice when a protective part has taken over, to pause, and to choose a different response. It’s not about being perfect. It’s about being willing to look at what’s really happening.

That’s how we break the bickering loop. Not with a better argument, but with a better understanding of who’s actually doing the arguing.


About Todd Creager

Todd Creager, LCSW, LMFT, is a relationship therapist and infidelity recovery specialist with over 30 years of clinical experience working with couples. He integrates Internal Family Systems (IFS), EMDR, and other evidence-based approaches to help partners move from reactive bickering to genuine connection. Todd’s work is grounded in the belief that recovery—from betrayal, from old patterns, from the wounds we carry—is not only possible but can lead to deeper, more authentic relationships than partners ever had before.

What if your next argument could bring you closer instead of driving you apart?


Learn how in Todd Creager’s Loving & Connecting Masterclass.
Lifetime access. Real results.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *